This article authored by Nertis Tech SEO Agency discusses the SEO implications of website migration and the ways to mitigate them. We analyse 5 types of migration, discuss business reasoning behind site migrations, suggest 3 biggest SEO problems related to migrations. Discussion of the SEO impact of website migration offers a framework of scenario analysis as well as a template for assessing the potential SEO casualties. Examples include the best and the second best scenarios for migrating several geo-specific websites to one domain.
Also, we offer an methodology of estimation of the number of SEO losses when reporting to internal stakeholders. Additionally, author success things to do pre-migration, suggest a comprehensive migration SEO checklist as well as come up with a multi-step redirection plan that helps mitigate crawl-related risks.
When we say migration we actually mean a "catch all" term. There are different types of migration, including:
So a risk level attached to each type of migration is obviously different:
Often, businesses have several types of migrations at once. For example “weare thinking about a domain migration because we are considering moving to another domain and there also might be a server migration. Yet, we are also thinking about redesign or a change in CSS and layout, i.e. design migration, and finally URL migration is also in question”. So, here at least four types of migration are caught by a single term. For the sake of this discussion, we will focus on domain and URL migration, which has the highest impact on SEO.
From the business practice migration is a "top down" decision, i.e. this decision was taken by management for internal reasons that are not necessarily aligned with SEO. This may include:
In most of the cases SEOs actually employ a kind of "afterthought style" here, i.e. now that the decision is taken SEO people would only discuss the input of each individual action and put numbers against it, including:
Redirection is not 1-to-1: when googlebot comes to a website by external link, the link quality signals (that would apply to the old URL) must be re-applied to the new one, and it’s not necessarily 1-to-1. When googlebot comes to visit and crawl the old URL and gets forwarded to the new one, the crawling capacities (also known as crawl budget) won’t necessarily be 1-to-1 as before. We call it two major risks of redirection and will discuss them (and how to mitigate them) later on.
During a website migration a number of individual factors come into play: the more people, the more parties involved, the more complex the problem gets and the risk of error is rising.
Bad timing risk. So bad timing is about when the migration comes in time with the Google algorithm update, which becomes more often these days. Why is it a problem? Because Google creates a classifier, or a website score, before making an update. And then test some hypothesis during the four weeks time to change this classifier. So, if you migrate in between, a whole new website shows up and Google must recalculate a classifier, test a hypothesis, etc.
These three high-level considerations create a possible approach to website migration through the lens of SEO: website migration is never a winning bet SEO-wise, so the role of SEO is to help mitigate the negative impacts of it.
SEO impact may be evaluated coming from the scenario analysis of the future migration. Let’s take an example.
Suppose we have several geo-specific websites that we want to migrate to one. ccTLD is a country-code top level domain, for example, .fr. So, we named 5 scenarios of migration depending on their impact on SEO. This includes:
This template ranges the scenarios from Best to Worst depending on the level of perceived SEO casualties. Apparently, the best scenarios will be when only one thing changes at a time and the maximum control over the process is retained.
The best case scenario is when we:
Pros:
The drawbacks of this scenario:
Here the Geo-folders become geo+language pairs, not geo only as above. For example, not PT for Portugal, but PT-PT for Portugal AND Portuguese language or PT-BR for Portugal and Brazilian language. So, we'd eventually have several sub-sites from one geography. Yet, from the very beginning we do only one: we migrate everything into one geography. PT-PT.
We do virtually the same, but we reserve the option for us to eventually (as a second step) make a PT-BR version for this website. Why is it better to do this later on? Or why is it a second best scenario?
Because It actually involves the bigger crawl budget: we will need a bot to index all Portuguese pages (except for those taken to Brazil) and then go to another sub folder, PT-BR and index some Brazilian ones too. Google may be reluctant to index in the first place without backlinks coming from Brazil.
Pros:
Cons:
SEO casualties can be calculated on the basis of data you already have in case of apparent losses.
Our experience with redirect suggests that, for example, if you redirect example.com/category to example.com/main-category/category, then allow for at least 30% traffic loss in this segment of pages (it can be used in communication with your stakeholders).
Timeframe for recovery: 2 months.
Permanent losses: 10-15% of clicks may be lost for good.
Here’s the minimal Pre-migration SEO Master Checklist:
Below the migration checklist organised by main stages and areas.
Main risks for SEO coming from website migration are:
Arguably, the crawl budget decline risk is the most profound one. It springs from a "deferred crawling", i.e. when Google visits pages and does not crawl it right away, instead creates a list of URL to return and crawl with regards to the:
Consider what happens when a bot has created a list of URLs to crawl and the website migration is performed (in the meatime).
So, when a robot comes to hit the pages from his (already) created list, it will be redirected and after several attempts will need to create a whole new list (abandon the old). This, in turn, has two implications:
In the meantime, while the pages are "blank tablet" vis a vis the ranking signals, the site-wide ranking signals are being applied, which is what we normally call a SEO loss due to a migration, i.e. certain well performing URLs will get (temporary) demoted vs before.
Now, a force re-calculation of ranking signals is rarely 1-to-1 as before. Some pages (and even page segments) might have less attention from Google vs before. Therefore, it's critical to avoid several types of migration at once and, most importantly, to avoid change of internal linking scheme, i.e. internal "importance" factors, which may result in:
Loss of Pagerank is normally mitigated through active link building in the migration phase (PR, etc campaigns) that drive external links to new URLs. Yet, most probably, at least a "soft" setback in SEO traffic is inevitable following a migration.
Standby period and ranking signals recalculation risk is mitigated by:
If you want to practically fence from crawl-related SEO risk, below is a multi-step migration plan, which provides a solution for “deferred crawl” issues. Here, destination domain refers to old URLs, targeted domain - new URLs.
Article written by: Bohdan Lytvyn, a founder of Nertis SEO Agency